[카테고리:] 미분류

  • Critical Analysis of Project Failure Risks

    1. Market Demand Issues

    • AI Art Fatigue: The market is already oversaturated with AI-generated images
    • Blockchain Skepticism: General public fatigue with blockchain/crypto after the hype cycle
    • Lack of Content Differentiation: “AI-generated abstract art” alone provides insufficient value proposition for repeat engagement

    2. Technical Risks

    • 30-Year Promise Unrealistic:
      • Blockchain networks themselves may disappear
      • Even Ethereum’s 30-year future is uncertain
      • Individual maintaining service for 30 years is fundamentally unrealistic
    • P2P System Limitations: Insufficient backers = insufficient seeds = download failures

    3. Business Model Flaws

    • No Revenue Structure: $500 for 30 years of service is economically impossible
    • Scalability Issues: If follow-up funding fails, even initial promises become undeliverable
    • Legal Risks: Potential regulatory changes affecting token issuance

    4. Single-Person Project Limitations

    • Bus Factor = 1: Creator’s incapacitation = project termination
    • Expertise Gaps: One person cannot effectively handle curation, marketing, community management, etc.
    • Funding Inadequacy: Personal injection of $8K is nowhere near sufficient

    5. Market Reality Check

    • 7 Notifications: Market interest level already tells the story
    • Complex Concept: Web3 + AI + Museum is too convoluted for mainstream users
    • Absence of Competition: Others not doing this likely indicates market validation issues

    Most Probable Failure Scenarios

    1. Funding Failure (Not reaching $500 target)
    2. Post-Funding Technical Failures preventing proper service delivery
    3. Service Shutdown after initial years due to funding depletion
    4. Legal Shutdown due to regulatory changes regarding tokens

    Honest Assessment

    • Good idea, questionable execution feasibility
    • 30-year promise is virtually impossible
    • Scale too large for solo operation
    • Zero market validation

    This type of project typically requires corporate backing or well-funded startup resources. A single developer attempting this scale appears to be a significant overreach.

    Red Flags for Potential Backers

    • Overpromising (30-year guarantee from individual)
    • Unrealistic economics (lifetime service for $100)
    • No contingency plans for creator unavailability
    • Complex technology stack with single point of failure
    • Market disinterest evidenced by low notification count

    The gap between ambition and realistic execution capacity suggests high probability of disappointment for early supporters.